20) The Princess Bride -- It boggles my mind how so many people rave about this movie. It's not funny, it's not charming, it's not entertaining, it's not fun -- it's dreary and seems MUCH longer than it actually is. This looks like what a friend of mine calls a "lunchtime production"; that is, some Hollywood folks had a lunch hour with nothing to do so they made this film.
21) Beat the Devil -- This so-called classic is a sad attempt to recapture past glories and tarnishes the reputation of so many truly talented people it's mind-boggling. Directed by John Huston, co-written by Truman Capote, starring Humphrey Bogart, Jennifer Jones, Peter Lorre, and Robert Morley (in the Sidney Greenstreet part), everyone looks tired and washed out (due in no small part to the incredibly ugly, washed-out photography of Oswald Morris). This is not Casablanca and it's not the Maltese Falcon; why is everyone pretending that it is. Sad and not entertaining.
22) Funny Face -- the only movie I can think of that managed to make both Fred Astaire AND Audrey Hepburn tedious and uninteresting.
23) The Greatest Show On Earth -- this "Best Picture of the Year" Oscar winner is a bore-a-thon of the worst order. Cecil B. DeMille instills every negative directorial quirk he's ever had while an all-star cast stumbles around with little idea what they're supposed to do. When the train derails, one only wishes it had crushed the film itself instead of the circus animals. Every other film nominated for "Best Picture" that year was ROBBED!
24) They Drive By Night -- this film is sometime mistakenly called film noir (Oh boy, it ain't!) and stars Humphrey Bogart and George Raft in a movie about truckers. Yes, believe it or not, it's even LESS interesting than that sounds. I swear the film is actually 6 hours long; it sure SEEMS that way. This is duller than watching baseball, watching golf OR watching farming. The golden age of Hollywood lost it's lustre on this one!
25) The Wrong Man -- Alfred Hitchcock is such a phenomenal director that I can't let this one sneak by without stabbing at it. Henry Fonda stars in this very un-Hitchcockian Hitchcock film about an innocent man on the run for a crime he didn't commit. Sounds like Hitchcock, I hear you say. Yes, it does. Then why, oh why, did Hitch decide to film it as a bland police procedural with absolutely NO Hitchcock touches and absolutely NO Hitchcock suspense. The only suspense caused by THIS movie is whether your heart will stop from sheer boredom. Even a master stumbles; here's where Hitchcock did.
26) 2001: A Space Odyssey. This is without doubt one of the most over-rated, self-indulgent, yawn-inducing steaming turd of a movie ever made. Again. . .not a Kubrick fan. Can you tell. The ENDLESS, interminable long shots on spaceships and space stations would try anyone's patience; a PROPER director would have realized that special effects quickly become outdated and surpassed so one shouldn't leave the camera on a model of a space station for 20 SOLID MINUTES!!! People jumping around in monkey suits? FASCINATING!!! Endless, pointless psychedelic light shows taking up the final third of the film. Now THAT'S storytelling! Arthur C. Clarke couldn't find the slightest vestige of his book in the movie. Neither could we.
So OK, that's my ranting and raving about the movies everyone else loves but I hate. I know my loyal readers MUST have there own list (I can hear Finky sharpening up his pencils for Sunset Blvd even as we speak). SO let's spit some venom and hurl some vitriol, people!
Sunset Blvd?? ugh, talk about your Snore-fest!!! i never had such an easier time falling asleep as i did when this piece of poo came on.
ReplyDeletePrincess Bride?!? This movie is charming and funny! I cant beleive you dont like this movie.
As for all the other movies, I dont know, never seen 'em. Except Rocky, which is a good movie. But i wont argue that cause Sly Stallone can be hard to watch.
Oh, go watch Conan the Barbarian, you silly douche. Snicker giggle chortle.
ReplyDeleteWell, I suppose this must be the list you were talking about way back in October when I did my list of my favorite horror movies. So now I gets to comment.
ReplyDelete1. Well, we get to disagree right off the bat. I can see how people could hate this movie. I didn't expect much from it when I went to see it. I knew about the book it was based on. However it is simplistic at it's core (as is it's main character) but if you look at it as a mock style biopic and only get snippets of someones life you wouldn't have a plot. A good movie doesn't need a plot if it has good acting. I laughed out loud at parts and cried at parts. Few movies can do that for me. Click with Adam Sandler is another one.
2. Awlful! Nuff said
3. Should have been a much better movie considering it was the last for both, they deserved better.
4. I can't talk about this movie it makes me gag and my mouth fills with bile.
5. The problem with this movie is that it wasn't supposed to be a comedy, at least the book wasn't (which I have read and like) and Kubrick made it a comedy. Just a bad idea that went too far.
6. Do you need me to comment on his one?
7. I don't hate it but I don't see what the big deal is.
8.Never saw it.
9.Couldn't make it all the way through.
10.Yeah surprisingly bad, that is the only funny line and the scene where Lemmon tries to clear his sinuses in the diner is kinda funny other than that crap.
11.Not a Hemingway fan.
12.Nah didn't like it eiher, it's a cruel comedy that is just too cold.
13.Have't read it ... er ... I mean seen it. I hate most all silent movies.
14. The Hollywood couple should have stopped at three.
15.Saw it when I was about 8 don't remember much so I don't know what that says about it. Perhaps I should see it again.
16.This one was on my list of my fav's so we disagree.
17.Yeah I don't get all the praise on this one either.
18.Yeah this was awlful.
19.Dude, Brad Pitt and Anjelina Jolie on the screen together is way hot. They make me harder than ... oh you meant the 1940's movie. Nevermind.
20.Okay, I don't hate this one but I don't see how it is supposedly, according to Bravo "one of the 50 funniest movies of all time" so between you and Bravo I fall somewhere in between.
21.I didn't get it, it is the very first "camp" movie, meaning it makes fun of the original (Falcon) but I don't know why you needed to in the first place.
22.Haven't seen it
23.There's a reason it's on the list for worst moviesto ever win Best Picture and that reason is euthanasia.
24. Haven't seen it.
25. Th problem with this one is that it was a true stoy and Hitch wanted to stay true to the story. Bad descision.
26. I have tried to watch this movie several times. I just can't do it!
Yes, this must be the list.
ReplyDeleteNo, you DON'T get to comment.
1. Oh, don't make me laugh. And no, Forrest Gump didn't make me laugh EITHER. Sorry, it sucks.
2. What was awful? You didn't say. And I don't remember what number 2 was supposed to be. Of course, neither do YOU by this point so let's go on to another topic.
3. How bought them Flyers!
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteNo, actually I dislike all these movies because I dislike them. No other reason. The idea of purposefully disliking something because I think it will appear cool is a ridiculous, shallow way to act so I don't subscribe to that particular way of doing things. Since I've consistently demonstrated my unconcern about the opinions of critics, the powers that be or dictators of public taste and fashion, the idea that I would dislike movies for such a "populist" reasons doesn't really hold water.
ReplyDeleteIn terms of general consensus regarding Rocky, I've actually found that opinion is about equally split between those who love it and those who don't. Regardless, my opinion is simply my own no matter what critics tell me to think.
Also, my inclusion of Rocky should come as no particular surprise to you since I told you I hated the movie almost immediately upon talking to you for the first time. Needless to say, I've re-stated the opinion many times since then as well. Either way, my like or dislike of ANY particular movie does not reflect on you or any other friend or how I feel about them so it should not be taken as some sort of attack on you or anyone else who likes a particular film. Cheeks doesn't take it as a personal affront to him that I hate Forrest Gump and he likes it; likewise I don't take it as a personal assault that Fink hates Sunset Blvd. whereas I love it. Films are films and people are people and personal taste is personal taste.
So frankly, your rather hostile and (seemingly unless I'm reading it wrong) intended to be hurtful comment about feeling justified (as if I personally attacked you) to say a movie I liked is crap comes as quite an unexpected and frankly disappointing surprise to me. Your dislike of a movie I like doesn't effect one iota our friendship; only deliberately trying to wound me somehow by saying so might. Either way, placing a film over one's personal relationships is not something that I do and I hope that you wouldn't either. I'd like to think we're all bigger than that.
I love Conan!! To say otherwise is bashful. I grew up watching the Conan movies, getting so joy and glee from the tremendous acting jobs of Arnold and Grace Jones. And how about the little chinese magician. He was just stellar. If only it would have come out as a double pack DVD. oh yeah, it did after I bought them individually. But that is another story. . .
ReplyDelete